Divorce Expo: Start Over Smart Expo In NYC Helps Divorcees (VIDEO)

After 14 years of marriage, Randi Lambert will finalize her divorce from her husband next month. But first, the mother of two said she plans to head to this weekend’s Start Over Smart Divorce Expo in New York City.

“I want to make sure I know anything and everything… [So] I won’t have to look back and say I should’ve, I could’ve,” she said during a “Today” show segment about the expo Friday.

Lambert won’t be the only one. On March 31 and April 1, people from all over the country will converge at New York City’s Metropolitan Pavillion for the inaugural Start Over Smart Divorce Expo, an event that will focus on navigating the divorce process and its aftermath. (Huffington Post Divorce, the media sponsor for the event, will host a panel on infidelity Sunday.)

Though the divorce rate hovers around 50 percent in the U.S., the sobering breakup process is all too often faced alone, said Francine Baras, a family therapist who co-founded Start Over Smart with her daughter, Nicole Baras Feuer, a mediator.

“Divorce is still in the closet. We think we talk about it but when you’re facing it yourself, you’re facing it alone,” Baras told “Today” correspondent Amy Robach.

Hoping to change that, the mother-daughter team created the expo where men and women in various stages of divorce can come together and attend panels featuring a wide range of experts — from attorneys and financial advisors to life coaches and style gurus. On Saturday night, professional matchmaker Amy Laurent will host a cocktail party at the same venue for the many newly-singles attending the event.

“Meeting other people going through a divorce is a huge part of the expo,” Baras Feuer, a recent divorcee herself, told the Huffington Post earlier this week.

To learn more about the Start Over Smart Divorce Expo, watch the “Today” show segment above and visit StartOverSmartNY.com.



“;
var coords = [-5, -72];
// display fb-bubble
FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’});
});

Photos shape opinions of Trayvon Martin case – Chicago Sun

By MATT SEDENSKY
Associated Press

March 31, 2012 12:00AM

This photo combo shows George Zimmerman. At left is a 2005 booking photo provided by the Orange County Jail via The Miami Herald, and at right is an undated but recent photo of Zimmerman taken from the Orlando Sentinel’s website showing Zimmerman, according to the paper. Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in the town of Sanford, Fla., told police he shot unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin on Feb. 26. The photo of Zimmerman at right is a sharp contrast from the widely used 2005 booking photo from an arrest in Miami Dade County. (AP Photo)


Article Extras





Updated: March 31, 2012 2:10AM

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — When he was shot, Trayvon Martin was not the baby-faced boy in the photo that has been on front pages across the country. And George Zimmerman wasn’t the beefy-looking figure in the widely published mugshot.

Both photos are a few years old and no longer entirely accurate. Yet they may have helped shape initial public perceptions of the deadly shooting.

“When you have such a lopsided visual comparison, it just stands to reason that people would rush to judgment,” said Kenny Irby, who teaches visual journalism at the Poynter Institute, a journalism think tank in St. Petersburg, Fla.

The most widely seen picture of Martin, released by his family, was evidently taken a few years ago and shows a smiling, round-cheeked youngster in a red T-shirt. But at his death, Martin was 17 years old, around 6 feet tall and, according to his family’s attorney, about 140 pounds.

Zimmerman, 28, is best known from a 7-year-old booking photo of an apparently heavyset figure with an imposing stare, pierced ear and facial hair, the orange collar of his jail uniform visible. The picture, released by police following the deadly shooting, was taken after Zimmerman’s 2005 arrest on an assault-on-an-officer charge that was eventually dropped.

In a police video made public this week of Zimmerman being brought in for questioning a half-hour after the shooting, the 5-foot-9 man appears much slimmer.

In a case that has caused a nationwide furor over race and the laws of self-defense, Martin was shot to death by Zimmerman in the city of Sanford on Feb. 26 as the unarmed black teenager was walking back from a convenience store.

Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer whose father is white and whose mother is Hispanic, has claimed self-defense, saying he opened fire after Martin punched him in the face, knocked him to the ground and began slamming his head on the sidewalk.

Black leaders and others are demanding Zimmerman’s arrest on murder or manslaughter charges, but state and federal authorities are still investigating.

Betsi Grabe, a professor at Indiana University-Bloomington who has studied the effect of news images on public opinion, said photos that gain the most traction play into the desires of both journalists and the public for a story with a distinct victim and aggressor.

“At the center of most stories we tell in our society, cross-culturally and across the centuries, is the struggle between good and evil,” she said. “If the ingredients are there, that is what journalists will grab onto and present.”

Grabe said it is natural to present the most innocent-looking image of the person believed to be the victim, and the most menacing one of the suspect.

A more complex portrait of the two figures has emerged since then. A photo of a beaming Zimmerman looking sharp in a jacket and tie has come out, along with a more recent picture of Martin, with gold teeth and a white sleeveless undershirt. At the same time, it was learned that Martin had been suspended from school for marijuana residue in his backpack.

The Associated Press has not been able to verify the sources or creators of what are purported to be more recent photographs of Martin circulating online and elsewhere. The family’s attorney has not released the photos.

“Everyone’s views seem to be gyrating back and forth with each new scrap of evidence that comes out,” said David O. Markus, a prominent Miami defense attorney. “This is why we have courts and juries, and why the process is slow. No one should rush to judgment.”

Gordon Coonfield, a communications professor at Villanova University in Pennsylvania, said the early perceptions of Zimmerman as a vigilante may ultimately have no bearing on the case.

He cited the case of Rodney King, the black motorist beaten two decades ago by white Los Angeles police officers in an episode captured on video. The officers were acquitted in state court, though two were later found guilty on federal charges.

“I think the nation felt quite certain it saw the truth of what happened to Rodney King, and the DA tried the case as if the images spoke for themselves,” Coonfield said. “Yet the state criminal court decided the images were not self-evidently true. The defense won by offering a more convincing explanation of the images, focusing on what could not be seen — officers’ motives, reasoning, and judgment.”

AP

The Florida Bar – Daily News Summary

An electronic digest of media coverage of interest to members of The Florida Bar compiled each workday by the Public Information and Bar Services Department. Electronic links are only active in today’s edition. For information on previous articles, please contact the publishing newspaper directly.

March 30, 2012

–Judiciary–

SUPER PACS, DONORS TURN SIGHTS ON JUDICIAL BRANCHThe Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com, March 29, 2012.
Just before sunset on a recent evening, scores of lawyers in dark suits and polished loafers streamed into the 18th-floor ballroom of a downtown Orlando high-rise. The invitation to the event had asked for a “suggested contribution” of $500 to each of three candidates. They were no ordinary politicians. In fact, they weren’t politicians at all, but rather Florida Supreme Court justices — R. Fred Lewis, Barbara Pariente and Peggy Quince. Each has been in office since the 1990s, each retained by voters overwhelmingly in previous elections. While deep-pocketed super PACs and ultra-wealthy donors have attracted plenty of attention in the presidential contest this year, they are also making waves further down the political food chain. The mere possibility that a rich benefactor or interest group with endless amounts of money could swoop in, write massive checks and remake an entire court for ideological reasons has prompted judges here in Florida and elsewhere to prepare for battles they never expected to fight. Those challenging the judges say their actions offer a way to inform the public and hold the judiciary accountable. The judges say they welcome accountability but want to protect the independence of the bench.

–Legal Profession–

MARTIN FAMILY LAWYER KNOWN FOR CIVIL RIGHTS CASESSt. Augustine Record, http://staugustine.com, March 30, 2012. [Also: TRAYVON MARTIN SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IMPOSES NEWS BLACKOUT-- Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com, March 30, 2012].
The St. Augustine Record article is by The Associated Press. When Benjamin Crump got his first call from Trayvon Martin’s father last month, the attorney counseled patience. It had only been two days since a neighborhood watch volunteer had fatally shot the 17-year-old in Sanford, and surely an arrest was imminent, thought Crump. Days passed. nothing. More than a month later, there still has been no arrest. Thanks largely to Crump’s efforts, the case has gained nationwide attention, merited comment from President Barack Obama, led to the resignation of the Sanford police chief and brought scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice into the Orlando suburb. Before Martin’s death, Crump was best known for representing the parents of Martin Lee Anderson, who died after an encounter with guards at a Florida boot camp in 2006. Crump and his law partner, Daryl Parks, are Tallahassee-based personal injury attorneys who primarily handle wrongful death and negligence cases. However, their everyday work often involves civil rights issues.

–Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline–

SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES 22 ATTORNEYSThe Florida Bar, http://www.floridabar.org, March 29, 2012. [Also: FOUR SOUTH FLORIDA ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED-- South Florida Business Journal, http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida, March 30, 2012; SUSPENDED VERO BEACH ATTORNEY PERMANENTLY BARRED FROM PRACTICING IN FLORIDA-- Treasure Coast Newspapers, http://www.tcpalm.com, March 30, 2012; FLORIDA SUPREME COURT REPRIMANDS MELBOURNE ATTORNEY-- Florida Today, http://www.floridatoday.com, March 30, 2012; JACKSONVILLE AREA ATTORNEY DISBARRED, TWO OTHERS SUSPENDED-- Jacksonville Business Journal, http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville, March 30, 2012].
The Florida Bar, the state’s guardian for the integrity of the legal profession, announces that the Florida Supreme Court, in court orders between Jan. 17 and Feb. 24, disciplined 22 attorneys, disbarring five and suspending 13. Some attorneys received more than one form of discipline. Two attorneys were placed on probation; four attorneys were publicly reprimanded and one attorney was ordered to pay restitution.

–Unlicensed Practice of Law–

LAKE CLARK SHORES COUPLE SENTENCED FOR DEFRAUDING IMMIGRANTSThe Palm Beach Post, http://www.palmbeachpost.com, March 30, 2012. [Also: SOUTH FLORIDA COUPLE SENTENCED FOR IMMIGRATION FRAUD-- Sun-Sentinel, http://www.sun-sentinel.com, March 30, 2012].
From The Palm Beach Post: Growing up in poverty in Cuba, Levy Garcia Crespo said he dreamed of making something of himself. Immigrating to the United States, he accomplished his dream and then some. The driveway of his nearly half-million dollar Lake Clarke Shores house was a testament to his success. It featured a seemingly never-ending stream of Lamborghinis, Maseratis, Porches, boats and motorcycles he bought with the money he earned in his burgeoning practice as an attorney. The only problem was that the 35-year-old wasn’t an attorney. With the help of his wife, Anyelina Cid Bonilla, Crespo masqueraded as a lawyer, persuading a steady stream of desperate immigrants that for a hefty price he could turn them into citizens, federal prosecutors said. In addition to filing nearly 3,200 false immigration documents, he appeared before federal immigration judges. on Thursday [March 29] U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra sentenced Crespo to 42 months in prison and Bonilla to a 30-month sentence.

First divorce expo in U.S. aims to ‘empower’ attendees

Bridal expos have long provided attendees with knowledge about what’s hot for the wedding process; but what’s out there for those dealing with the harrowing situation of divorce?

The “Start Over Smart” expo, the first divorce expo in the U.S., promises to put a friendly face on the process. The two-day event, held in New York City this weekend, will draw industry professionals together to offer information and services to those going through a divorce.

Francine Baras and her daughter Nicole Baras Feuer are launching “Start Over Smart” with hopes that it will be a hit and enable them to host the event in other cities. And with half of all marriages in the U.S. ending in divorce, there’s a need for this expo, the pair tell TODAY’s Amy Robach in a segment that aired Friday.

“Divorce is still in the closet,” said Baras. “We think we talk about it, but when you’re facing it yourself, you are facing it alone.”

Cities throughout Europe have been putting on such expos for years, and Baras and Feuer were actually inspired to bring the event to the U.S. after heading to one in Paris. “[We] fell in love with the idea,” Baras said.

The mother-daughter team brings relevant experience to the table. Baras is married and a family therapist. Feuer, a recent divorcée and single mom, is a divorce mediator. Calling her own divorce “isolating,” she set out to put everything into the expo that she wished she’d had when she was going through her divorce.


    1. 30-second therapist: How do I forgive a cheater? 


    2. First divorce expo in U.S. aims to ‘empower’ attendees


    3. Planning a wedding before the proposal? Let Pinterest help


    4. 30-second therapist: Why won’t he say ‘I love you’?


    5. Oh, how times have changed over 50 years of marriage

The event, which costs $75 for a one-day ticket and $125 for both days, includes over 100 professionals that deal with divorce, with vendors hawking everything that one would expect, like counseling, legal services and financial expertise (TODAY money expert Jean Chatzky is a keynote speaker at the event). More surprising exhibitors include a business that arranges ceremonies providing reconciliation for couples embroiled in divorce proceedings, plastic surgery professionals, a matchmaker and beauty experts.

“Besides having all this information that’s very important to demystify divorce,” Baras said, “we have the other side…how to put your makeup on again; how to feel sexual, how to start dating.”

Randi Lambert, a mother of two, is ending a 14-year marriage and says she plans to attend the expo.

“I want to make sure I know anything and everything,” she said. “(So) I won’t have to look back and say I should’ve, I could’ve.”

Baras and Feuer say they’re not proponents of divorce; instead, they are in the business of supporting the people going through the process. Feuer calls the expo “empowering and uplifting,” and says that people shouldn’t look at divorce as something negative, but as a necessary transition in people’s lives when the dream of happily ever after doesn’t quite last for forever.

© 2012 MSNBC Interactive. 



Reprints

Bank Fraud Conviction Reversed In Benton Bank Case, Defendant Released …

MIAMI, Mar 30, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) –
White collar criminal defense attorney David M. Garvin today announced
the successful appeal of the bank fraud conviction of Timothy Parkes in
a case involving the former Benton Bank in Polk County, Tenn. On Feb. 2,
the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its unanimous decision in the
case of United States v. Timothy Parkes, Case No. 09-6525, reversing
convictions of bank fraud on all counts and granting the defendant’s
motion for judgment of acquittal. The court held that the district court
had incorrectly denied Parkes’ motion for acquittal following the jury
trial.

“After a long battle, we are pleased that Timothy Parkes is once again a
free man,” said Garvin. “The appeals process can be lengthy and arduous,
but it proves that bad decisions can be reversed and defendants can get
a second chance at justice.”

Parkes and his partner Mark Mourier were each charged with 13 counts of
bank fraud arising from loans that were made to more than 10 LLCs for
millions of dollars by Benton Bank. The bank president was separately
charged and pled guilty. Ultimately, the bank failed. Parkes was also
charged with making a false statement to special agents during the
investigation.

The jury found Mourier not guilty on all counts. Parkes was found not
guilty on three counts of bank fraud and one count of making a false
statement. During the trial the court prohibited Parkes from presenting
evidence to support the theory of his defense, i.e. that the bank
president had acted alone. In addition, Parkes’ motion for mistrial was
denied despite the fact the prosecutor improperly told the jury if they
acquitted Parkes, he would get to keep more than $4 million of the
bank’s money. Parkes timely moved for judgment of acquittal based upon
insufficient evidence. The district court denied the motion. Parkes
appealed.

The Sixth Circuit Court of appeals found that the district court erred
when it prevented Parkes from introducing evidence in support of his
defense. The court also found that the district court erred when it
denied Parkes’ motion for mistrial based upon the prosecutor’s
misconduct and most importantly when the district Court denied Parkes’
Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal due to insufficient evidence.

For more information, please contact Garvin at info@davidmgarvin.com
or (305) 371-8101.

SOURCE: Law Offices of David M. Garvin



        
        David PR Group 
        John P. David, 305-255-0035 
        john@davidpr.com
        


Copyright Business Wire 2012

Comtex

The Florida Bar – Daily News Summary

An electronic digest of media coverage of interest to members of The Florida Bar compiled each workday by the Public Information and Bar Services Department. Electronic links are only active in today’s edition. For information on previous articles, please contact the publishing newspaper directly.

March 29, 2012

–Judiciary–

JUSTICES TALK WITH STETSON LAW STUDENTS ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMStetson Law News, http://www.law.stetson.edu, March 27, 2012.
 Florida Supreme Court Justices Fred Lewis, Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince spoke with students at Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport on Monday [March 26] about the role of the judicial system and Florida’s merit retention system. All three justices formerly served as chief justices of Florida’s highest court. In November, voters will decide whether the justices will keep their jobs for another six-year term. The article includes comments from each justice.

COURT GIVES TEEN OFFENDERS A CHANCEThe Gainesville Sun, http://www.gainesville.com, March 29, 2012.
The article details the Alachua County Teen Court program, which gives first-time offenders between the ages of 10 and 17 a chance to keep their records clean. It also gives teens with aspirations of careers in the criminal justice system a chance to get first-hand experience in the field. The program has been in Alachua County since 1994 and has been run by the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office since 1998. Offenders in the program are referred by the State Attorney’s Office and stand trial in a regular courtroom with other teens serving as defense lawyers, jurors and prosecutors. Adult volunteers from the community serve as judges. Teen Court is funded by $3 from every traffic citation written. The court proceedings are kept confidential, which program officials say is one reason for its success.

–Legislature–

LAWMAKERS PRESERVED ALIMONYThe Ledger, column, http://www.theledger.com, March 29, 2012.
The guest column by attorney David L. Manz, chair of The Florida Bar’s Family Law Section, states: “During the 2012 legislative session, the Florida Legislature took an important step to ensure fair-and-equitable provisions for individuals and families facing divorce. The Legislature faced down a threat from a special interest group called Floridians For Alimony Reform, which sought to change alimony laws to the benefit of a small, one-sided group of Floridians. The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar, which represents more than 4,000 family-law attorneys across the state, opposed FAR’s efforts throughout the 2012 session. The Family Law Section is comprised of practicing attorneys who represent husbands and wives, mothers and fathers, and children and families. We knew that changing our alimony laws would increase the need and cost of litigation, put primarily women at risk and negatively affect Florida’s children.”

–Civil Justice Issues–

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT VOTES 5-2 TO HEAR STATE’S APPEAL OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT DECISIONSt. Augustine Record,http://staugustine.com, March 29, 2012.
The article is by The Associated Press. The Florida Supreme Court will hear the state’s appeal of a judge’s ruling that struck down a requirement for public employees to contribute to their pensions. The high court voted 5-2 on Wednesday [March 28] to take the case, setting oral argument for Sept. 5.  The law requires public employees to contribute 3 percent of their pay to the Florida Retirement System. A Tallahassee judge sided with labor groups that challenged the law, ruling it violates employees’ property, contract and collective bargaining rights. Chief Justice Charles Canady and Justice Ricky Polston dissented.

COURT APPEARS SPLIT BY IDEOLOGY OVER HEALTH CAREThe Florida Times-Union, http://www.jacksonville.com, March 29, 2012.
The article is by The Associated Press Washington Bureau. Concluding three days of fervent, public disagreement, the Supreme Court, seemingly split over ideology, will now wrestle in private about whether to strike down key parts or even all of President Barack Obama’s historic health care law. The justices’ decision, due this June, will affect the way virtually every American receives and pays for care. The court wrapped up public arguments Wednesday [March 28]. Both liberal and conservative justices appeared on Wednesday to accept the administration’s argument that at least two important insurance changes are so closely tied to the must-have-coverage requirement that they could not survive without it: provisions requiring insurers to cover people regardless of their existing medical problems and limiting how much those companies can charge in premiums based on a person’s age or health. Less clear was whether the court would conclude the entire law would have to be cast aside.

TOBACCO JURY AWARDS $20 MILLION IN PUNITIVE DAMAGESJackson County Floridan, http://www.jcfloridan.com, March 29, 2012.
A Jackson County jury awarded $20 million in punitive damages Wednesday [March 28] to lung cancer victim Emmon Smith, who began his lawsuit against the R.J. Reynolds tobacco company about four years ago. It is the largest award in the history of litigation in Jackson County, according to case attorney J.B. Harris. Wednesday’s proceeding was the second phase of the jury’s work. On Tuesday [March 27], the panel agreed that Smith was due significant compensatory damages. The jury settled on a figure of $10 million in that portion of the case, but effectively reduced Smith’s award to $7 million in compensation by judging that Smith carried a 30 percent share of the blame for his health problems.

Peter Facinelli files for divorce from Jennie Garth

Peter Facinelli and Jennie Garth

Peter Facinelli on Wednesday filed for divorce from Jennie Garth, and she in turn filed her response, making official the relationship bombshell they dropped two weeks back.

The paperwork reportedly came over the Los Angeles Superior Court transom 15 days after the couple, who have three children together, announced their plans to separate after 11 years of marriage.

“While we have decided to end our marriage, we both share the same deep love and devotion to our children,” Facinelli and Garth said at the time in a joint statement. “We remain dedicated to raising our beautiful daughters together. We ask for privacy and respect during this time.”

The reason given for the split was irreconcilable differences, apparently revolving in large part around the toll Facinelli’s work schedule took on their marriage. The “Twilight Saga” and “Nurse Jackie” star was commuting to Vancouver, Canada, and New York during the week, returning to California most weekends to the family home in Santa Ynez, Garth told People. The day after announcing their split, the couple publicly denied rumors of infidelity, calling them “hurtful.”

When Facinelli asked Garth last fall for a divorce, she was “very resistant,” she said.

“I didn’t want it to happen,” she told the mag. “It took me some time to come to peace with it.”

The divorce documents give the couple’s separation date as Jan. 1 of this year. They are, according to TMZ, seeking joint physical and legal custody of daughters Luca, 14, Lola, 9, and 5-year-old Fiona. She is requesting her legal name be changed back to Jennie Garth from Jennie Facinelli.

RELATED:

Jennie Garth, Peter Facinelli to divorce after 11 years

Jennie Garth, Peter Facinelli deny ‘hurtful’ rumors of infidelity

Dennis Quaid’s wife, Kimberly Buffington-Quaid, files for divorce in Texas

— Christie D’Zurilla
twitter.com/dzurillaville
Christie D’Zurilla on Google+

 

Photo: Peter Facinelli and Jennie Garth in June 2010 at “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse” premiere in L.A. Credit: Chris Pizzello / Associated Press

 

$5M bond set for suspect in Ohio office stabbings


A judge has ordered a $5 million bond for a man accused of stabbing four people in an Ohio office building.

John Mallett appeared in Franklin County Municipal Court on Thursday on charges he injured four people in Columbus on March 14 before being shot by police. He had been released from the hospital and jailed Wednesday pending the arraignment on four counts of felonious assault.

He faces an April 6 hearing to determine if the case goes before a grand jury.

Investigators say the attack appeared random. They say Mallett carried three knives into the building, which houses a career college and offices for the Ohio attorney general staff.

Mallett’s father has said his son is schizophrenic and might have been under stress.