Divorce Expo: Start Over Smart Expo In NYC Helps Divorcees (VIDEO)

After 14 years of marriage, Randi Lambert will finalize her divorce from her husband next month. But first, the mother of two said she plans to head to this weekend’s Start Over Smart Divorce Expo in New York City.

“I want to make sure I know anything and everything… [So] I won’t have to look back and say I should’ve, I could’ve,” she said during a “Today” show segment about the expo Friday.

Lambert won’t be the only one. On March 31 and April 1, people from all over the country will converge at New York City’s Metropolitan Pavillion for the inaugural Start Over Smart Divorce Expo, an event that will focus on navigating the divorce process and its aftermath. (Huffington Post Divorce, the media sponsor for the event, will host a panel on infidelity Sunday.)

Though the divorce rate hovers around 50 percent in the U.S., the sobering breakup process is all too often faced alone, said Francine Baras, a family therapist who co-founded Start Over Smart with her daughter, Nicole Baras Feuer, a mediator.

“Divorce is still in the closet. We think we talk about it but when you’re facing it yourself, you’re facing it alone,” Baras told “Today” correspondent Amy Robach.

Hoping to change that, the mother-daughter team created the expo where men and women in various stages of divorce can come together and attend panels featuring a wide range of experts — from attorneys and financial advisors to life coaches and style gurus. On Saturday night, professional matchmaker Amy Laurent will host a cocktail party at the same venue for the many newly-singles attending the event.

“Meeting other people going through a divorce is a huge part of the expo,” Baras Feuer, a recent divorcee herself, told the Huffington Post earlier this week.

To learn more about the Start Over Smart Divorce Expo, watch the “Today” show segment above and visit StartOverSmartNY.com.



“;
var coords = [-5, -72];
// display fb-bubble
FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’});
});

Photos shape opinions of Trayvon Martin case – Chicago Sun

By MATT SEDENSKY
Associated Press

March 31, 2012 12:00AM

This photo combo shows George Zimmerman. At left is a 2005 booking photo provided by the Orange County Jail via The Miami Herald, and at right is an undated but recent photo of Zimmerman taken from the Orlando Sentinel’s website showing Zimmerman, according to the paper. Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in the town of Sanford, Fla., told police he shot unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin on Feb. 26. The photo of Zimmerman at right is a sharp contrast from the widely used 2005 booking photo from an arrest in Miami Dade County. (AP Photo)


Article Extras





Updated: March 31, 2012 2:10AM

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — When he was shot, Trayvon Martin was not the baby-faced boy in the photo that has been on front pages across the country. And George Zimmerman wasn’t the beefy-looking figure in the widely published mugshot.

Both photos are a few years old and no longer entirely accurate. Yet they may have helped shape initial public perceptions of the deadly shooting.

“When you have such a lopsided visual comparison, it just stands to reason that people would rush to judgment,” said Kenny Irby, who teaches visual journalism at the Poynter Institute, a journalism think tank in St. Petersburg, Fla.

The most widely seen picture of Martin, released by his family, was evidently taken a few years ago and shows a smiling, round-cheeked youngster in a red T-shirt. But at his death, Martin was 17 years old, around 6 feet tall and, according to his family’s attorney, about 140 pounds.

Zimmerman, 28, is best known from a 7-year-old booking photo of an apparently heavyset figure with an imposing stare, pierced ear and facial hair, the orange collar of his jail uniform visible. The picture, released by police following the deadly shooting, was taken after Zimmerman’s 2005 arrest on an assault-on-an-officer charge that was eventually dropped.

In a police video made public this week of Zimmerman being brought in for questioning a half-hour after the shooting, the 5-foot-9 man appears much slimmer.

In a case that has caused a nationwide furor over race and the laws of self-defense, Martin was shot to death by Zimmerman in the city of Sanford on Feb. 26 as the unarmed black teenager was walking back from a convenience store.

Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer whose father is white and whose mother is Hispanic, has claimed self-defense, saying he opened fire after Martin punched him in the face, knocked him to the ground and began slamming his head on the sidewalk.

Black leaders and others are demanding Zimmerman’s arrest on murder or manslaughter charges, but state and federal authorities are still investigating.

Betsi Grabe, a professor at Indiana University-Bloomington who has studied the effect of news images on public opinion, said photos that gain the most traction play into the desires of both journalists and the public for a story with a distinct victim and aggressor.

“At the center of most stories we tell in our society, cross-culturally and across the centuries, is the struggle between good and evil,” she said. “If the ingredients are there, that is what journalists will grab onto and present.”

Grabe said it is natural to present the most innocent-looking image of the person believed to be the victim, and the most menacing one of the suspect.

A more complex portrait of the two figures has emerged since then. A photo of a beaming Zimmerman looking sharp in a jacket and tie has come out, along with a more recent picture of Martin, with gold teeth and a white sleeveless undershirt. At the same time, it was learned that Martin had been suspended from school for marijuana residue in his backpack.

The Associated Press has not been able to verify the sources or creators of what are purported to be more recent photographs of Martin circulating online and elsewhere. The family’s attorney has not released the photos.

“Everyone’s views seem to be gyrating back and forth with each new scrap of evidence that comes out,” said David O. Markus, a prominent Miami defense attorney. “This is why we have courts and juries, and why the process is slow. No one should rush to judgment.”

Gordon Coonfield, a communications professor at Villanova University in Pennsylvania, said the early perceptions of Zimmerman as a vigilante may ultimately have no bearing on the case.

He cited the case of Rodney King, the black motorist beaten two decades ago by white Los Angeles police officers in an episode captured on video. The officers were acquitted in state court, though two were later found guilty on federal charges.

“I think the nation felt quite certain it saw the truth of what happened to Rodney King, and the DA tried the case as if the images spoke for themselves,” Coonfield said. “Yet the state criminal court decided the images were not self-evidently true. The defense won by offering a more convincing explanation of the images, focusing on what could not be seen — officers’ motives, reasoning, and judgment.”

AP

The Florida Bar – Daily News Summary

An electronic digest of media coverage of interest to members of The Florida Bar compiled each workday by the Public Information and Bar Services Department. Electronic links are only active in today’s edition. For information on previous articles, please contact the publishing newspaper directly.

March 30, 2012

–Judiciary–

SUPER PACS, DONORS TURN SIGHTS ON JUDICIAL BRANCHThe Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com, March 29, 2012.
Just before sunset on a recent evening, scores of lawyers in dark suits and polished loafers streamed into the 18th-floor ballroom of a downtown Orlando high-rise. The invitation to the event had asked for a “suggested contribution” of $500 to each of three candidates. They were no ordinary politicians. In fact, they weren’t politicians at all, but rather Florida Supreme Court justices — R. Fred Lewis, Barbara Pariente and Peggy Quince. Each has been in office since the 1990s, each retained by voters overwhelmingly in previous elections. While deep-pocketed super PACs and ultra-wealthy donors have attracted plenty of attention in the presidential contest this year, they are also making waves further down the political food chain. The mere possibility that a rich benefactor or interest group with endless amounts of money could swoop in, write massive checks and remake an entire court for ideological reasons has prompted judges here in Florida and elsewhere to prepare for battles they never expected to fight. Those challenging the judges say their actions offer a way to inform the public and hold the judiciary accountable. The judges say they welcome accountability but want to protect the independence of the bench.

–Legal Profession–

MARTIN FAMILY LAWYER KNOWN FOR CIVIL RIGHTS CASESSt. Augustine Record, http://staugustine.com, March 30, 2012. [Also: TRAYVON MARTIN SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IMPOSES NEWS BLACKOUT-- Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com, March 30, 2012].
The St. Augustine Record article is by The Associated Press. When Benjamin Crump got his first call from Trayvon Martin’s father last month, the attorney counseled patience. It had only been two days since a neighborhood watch volunteer had fatally shot the 17-year-old in Sanford, and surely an arrest was imminent, thought Crump. Days passed. nothing. More than a month later, there still has been no arrest. Thanks largely to Crump’s efforts, the case has gained nationwide attention, merited comment from President Barack Obama, led to the resignation of the Sanford police chief and brought scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice into the Orlando suburb. Before Martin’s death, Crump was best known for representing the parents of Martin Lee Anderson, who died after an encounter with guards at a Florida boot camp in 2006. Crump and his law partner, Daryl Parks, are Tallahassee-based personal injury attorneys who primarily handle wrongful death and negligence cases. However, their everyday work often involves civil rights issues.

–Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline–

SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES 22 ATTORNEYSThe Florida Bar, http://www.floridabar.org, March 29, 2012. [Also: FOUR SOUTH FLORIDA ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED-- South Florida Business Journal, http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida, March 30, 2012; SUSPENDED VERO BEACH ATTORNEY PERMANENTLY BARRED FROM PRACTICING IN FLORIDA-- Treasure Coast Newspapers, http://www.tcpalm.com, March 30, 2012; FLORIDA SUPREME COURT REPRIMANDS MELBOURNE ATTORNEY-- Florida Today, http://www.floridatoday.com, March 30, 2012; JACKSONVILLE AREA ATTORNEY DISBARRED, TWO OTHERS SUSPENDED-- Jacksonville Business Journal, http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville, March 30, 2012].
The Florida Bar, the state’s guardian for the integrity of the legal profession, announces that the Florida Supreme Court, in court orders between Jan. 17 and Feb. 24, disciplined 22 attorneys, disbarring five and suspending 13. Some attorneys received more than one form of discipline. Two attorneys were placed on probation; four attorneys were publicly reprimanded and one attorney was ordered to pay restitution.

–Unlicensed Practice of Law–

LAKE CLARK SHORES COUPLE SENTENCED FOR DEFRAUDING IMMIGRANTSThe Palm Beach Post, http://www.palmbeachpost.com, March 30, 2012. [Also: SOUTH FLORIDA COUPLE SENTENCED FOR IMMIGRATION FRAUD-- Sun-Sentinel, http://www.sun-sentinel.com, March 30, 2012].
From The Palm Beach Post: Growing up in poverty in Cuba, Levy Garcia Crespo said he dreamed of making something of himself. Immigrating to the United States, he accomplished his dream and then some. The driveway of his nearly half-million dollar Lake Clarke Shores house was a testament to his success. It featured a seemingly never-ending stream of Lamborghinis, Maseratis, Porches, boats and motorcycles he bought with the money he earned in his burgeoning practice as an attorney. The only problem was that the 35-year-old wasn’t an attorney. With the help of his wife, Anyelina Cid Bonilla, Crespo masqueraded as a lawyer, persuading a steady stream of desperate immigrants that for a hefty price he could turn them into citizens, federal prosecutors said. In addition to filing nearly 3,200 false immigration documents, he appeared before federal immigration judges. on Thursday [March 29] U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra sentenced Crespo to 42 months in prison and Bonilla to a 30-month sentence.